Learning Theories & Principles

After having clicked through the virtual session “Learning Theories & Principles” on VCT, I tried to think of those topics which I could remember best. What I immediately came up with was the three learning theories at the beginning of the session.

Though I already heard the terms behaviorism and cognitivism before studying them at the virtual session, I did not know anything about the concepts behind these theories. Another term which I absolutely failed with was actually constructivism. What could it mean? Firstly, I thought of a kind of learning construction being connected to linguistic chunks. However, after having read the definition, I realized that it was something completely different – a theory based on each learner’s individual perception of the world. I really was fascinated about the idea that everybody relies on his/ her personal experience and knowledge.

After having thought about constructivism again thoroughly, I was convinced by its concept mostly for two reasons. The first one is the fact that every person grows up under different circumstances and therefore experiences unlikely situations which sensitize the way of thinking. Furthermore I was persuaded by the argumentation about the understanding of the parts and the wholes. The theory says that the thinking process is restricted to overall concepts only, without being fixed on incoherent or unrelated parts. One also could argue that understanding of certain elements is not less important, for reasons of understanding the overall concept. However, as said in the definition, “parts must be understood in the context of wholes”. All in all, what I personally like about constructivism is on the one hand the idea of individual perception and on the other hand its interference with other learning theories, like for instance cognitivism, with its explorative learning.

However one should always keep in mind that the role of the teacher requires the knowledge or awareness of all three theories of learning, as there are still many pupils who, for instance, stick to the “drill and practice approach” which results from behaviorism.

Our task is to strengthen pupils’ self-confidence and make them learn more autonomously in order to pave the way for creativity and innovation.

Though this is a hard and tedious procedure, we nethertheless should engage in supporting our students’ learning and teach them responsibility and patience.

In addition, some learning principles like the distance education and different skills were presented. What I really liked about the unit was the detailed description of skills which pupils can acquire by using new media, like for instance the internet. I have nether thought of this advantage, so it was good news for me. The only problem about the unit on learning principles was the lacking structure. On the one hand I had problems with relating “lifelong learning” with the “skills trained at school”, on the other hand I could not draw any connection between the learning principles and the theories discussed before. It looks plausible to me that besides media competence, the methodological, scientific and social skills could result from distance learning. However this is only an assumption, so I do not engage in this being right.

All in all, the unit provided me with new knowledge on different learning systems which are of great importance for planning lessons, as I have to take into account students’ individual learning strategies. Besides this fact I actually sensitized my awareness of the importance of media competence which offers students the possibility to improve various skills.

Mark Bauerlein’s interview on his book “The Dumbest Generation”

In this post I would like to take a closer look at the first part of the interview, Mark Bauerlein is giving on his book “The Dumbest Generation”. He builds up his argumentation on the observation that media and especially sources like the internet, cell phones, i-pods and other new technologies gain more and more importance in adults’ lives. Actually Bauerlein perceives digital culture as a source of danger for America’s future, as he believes in teenagers abandoning reading books or going to museums and thus, as a consequence, become stupid and ignorant. He blames them in spending too much time with chatting and exchanging information via social networks instead of using the time more reasonably, like for instance, for the purpose of studying.

In my opinion Bauerlein makes an important observation which either corresponds to European adults. It is true that teenagers preferably spend their free time hanging up in chat rooms, playing video games or phoning their friends. And this tendency is rather natural, as friendship and social interaction ranks first, as long as no greater responsibilities have to be taken over. However I would agree with him in this aspect only.

What I would like to criticize about his statement is his narrow-mindedness about the young generation. He does not make any distinction between individuals who use the internet for research on certain topics and those who just need it to check their E-Mails and chat with other teens. In my opinion it is wrong to treat everybody as equal, because each person has his or her own character and hence individual attitudes towards life.

The second aspect which I would like to criticize is his claim about the youths’ lack of interest concerning books and museums. Bauerlein blames the media for their disinterest towards culture, but what about students’ apathy towards reading etc. in the past, before the internet came into being? I can hardly imagine that those adults who were interested in culture ten or fifteen years ago abruptly changed their opinions in favor of the internet. It is the same with those who did not like cultural events before the internet was invented. I am sure that they spent their time playing soccer or listening to music instead of going to museums or reading books. Why should they suddenly have changed their habits in favor of cultural events?

In addition Bauerlein states that teenagers lack creativity and new ideas because of hanging up in social networks. I would disagree with him, since among simple messages like “hello” and “bye bye”, both the ability to express one’s opinion on different topics and argumentation techniques can be practiced. These skills are quite important for students’ later careers, especially for those who plan to study or work in a concern there writing skills are required.

Taking all pros and cons into consideration, I can conclusively say that Bauerlein makes an important observation which however does not hold for everybody among the youths. As by now I do not have much background information and statistics on which media youths are foremost using, I hope that the PS “New Media in FL classroom” will reveal some facts about adults’ preferences concerning digital culture. This information might be very useful for my teacher career, for then I will be able to apply certain media for intended purposes and also show my students how it can be used more reasonably.

« Older entries